Projects

Project 1 Public Transport ( hit - to see list of projects )

An example of waste in public transport.   One of hundreds .

Summary.

Proposal . That the 236 service to/from Cork to Glengarriff/Castletownbere  be stopped and that this service  (as often already is….see buseireann timetable ) be Cork to/from Bantry with feeder buses which already exist bringing people effected to Bantry at same times as before.   Note. no distruption to the adequate frequency of available transport to Bantry is caused by this proposal.

 

We have to accept the car is king and rightly so. We must use it more smartly. 
Money saved (see below for breakdown) €239,840 
Co2……75.6 tons
detailed breakdown:
Bus Kilometres saved per annum……74,256km
Litres of Fuel saved ….28,217 litres @38l/100/km (conservative for this size bus on these roads)
Cost of fuel………………..€47,968 (@€1.70/l)
Co2 emissions save…………75,621kg @2.68kg /litre burned
Approx number of trees needed to absorb this amount of CO2 … 3024 wOOw
Driver timed saved …………………. 34 hrs + …excludes breaks but includes drive time to from Bantry to Glengarriff when necessary (unnecessary with new proposal)
Extra saving for drivers in own/company car ….13,000km/year (drive to from Bantry to Glengarriff) Not included in above calculations
Co2 2620kg 10 trees to absorb
€4500 cost of fuel.
Industry sources claim fuel costs to be 20% of the total. Therefore we estimate the total savings in monetary terms to be €239,800. As most of this comes from taxpayers in form of subsidies saving it will be a big saving to You and to the enviroment. A win win.
wOOw
See below for comments on other savings.
Remember we are not cutting the service.
The timings of the 232 , 236 and 270 would just need very slight adjustments to make the service work.

go to project no 1 , a sample project to see how €230,00 can be saved and put inyour pocket. thousandsmof similar examples. wOOw will find.

Introduction:
We all appreciate that public transport is a good thing. However when we have a system that is very badly run and we have to finance it with tens of millions of our taxes we need to take a look at how we can both improve the service while we also reduce the waste. The good news is its possible.
Using this example you should going forward be more aware of similar wastage in your area and hopefully some of you will measure it and like us propose a solution which is to the benefit of all including those working in the business being examined.
With many experts saying that its inevitable that by 2030 Ireland will be subject of up to €30bn penalties due to our emissions taking action now has never been more important. There is an enormous environmental impact caused by transport waste and we must look for solutions to fix this waste both in private and in public transport.
With a bus weighing 13.8 to 18 tonnes unladen and running as poorly as 2km for one litre of fuel it’s very important that they are used efficiently. We can perhaps appreciate that a single occupancy car is not good both from an environmental but also from a congestion (traffic) point but a bus with just three 256km or four (even 10) passengers is no better.
Our last government was instrumental in increasing the number of buses on our roads and while the numbers using buses is up, mostly in line with population increase, the number of cars on our roads continues to grow. One has to accept that the Car is King. It makes sense. Who apart from idealists can expect people with a car outside their door to take a bus if it involves a long walk at one or both ends. Ironically many who drive and don’t use buses are the first to object when a service is questioned. That said we do need to make public transport the preferred option in places like cities.
This project will look at one bus as an example and propose how we can make massive savings while still providing the service.
The bus we have chosen to start with is the 236 which operates from Cork to Castletownbere. Not all of the 236 buses go all the way to Castletownbere. Some end in Glengarriff and some in Bantry. Like wise not all start from Castletownbere.
The main bus used on this route is a 79 seater double decker.
One of these buses is parked in Glengariff each evening.
At 6.40 on Monday, Wednesday and Friday it leaves Glengariff empty, is driven 32km to Castletownbere on a road that is not suitable for such a long tall bus.
It returns to Glengariff with 2 to 5 people at 8am….64km travelled and almost 1.5hrs since the driver arrived in Glengariff. The driver will often have travelled up to 2hrs+ in their car/van to arrive there for 6.30
The bus heads to Bantry and picks up a few along the way.
However 25mins later another TFI bus arrives from Castletownbere (the 232 from Allihies).
The 236 arrives in Cork bus station at 10.27 A private service 231 (again subsidised by TFI) also goes from Ardgroom and takes in Castletownbere and Glengarriff (@8.25) This arrives in Cork by a different route after Ballylickey @9.50
In the evening the 236 bus that left Castletownbere at 7.20 am leaves Cork at 14.30 and arrives back at Castletownbere at 17.30 practically empty. The driver must then drive it empty back to Glengariff another 32km before driving himself home (up to 2hrs +). The safety of all this driving also needs to be questioned. The bus is not used for public transport from 17.30 until 8.00 the next day
There are a number of other services to Glengarriff and on some days to Castletownbere (again most often using an unnecessary 79 seater)

The road from Glengarriff is too narrow for a 79-seater double-decker. ….but not needed anyway as there is a duplicate service with a more suitable bus.

 

with Michael Collins on Grand Parade

Proposal
Looking at the timetables the 232 local link from Allihies to Kilcrohane via Bantry is an obvious bus that should be used a feeder bus to Bantry meaning there is no need to run the 79 seater 236 beyond Bantry any day. The 270 from Killarney to Skibbereen also serves as a link from Glengarriff to Bantry. This service does need looking at. It is also so inefficient. Often empty from Kenmare to Glengarriff, with very few on it from Kenmare to Bantry.
Savings already mentioned in summary … see above
As said already the timings of the 232, 236 and 270 would just need very slight adjustments to make the service work.
Note that apart from the environmental impact that a fine of €30bn is almost €6000 per person (man, woman and child) in Ireland.
Other benefits;
Major environmental benefit as already pointed out.
The bus hrs saved means that the bus could be used elsewhere, most likely in city..
The man hrs saved would mean that driver shortages would be solved.
Less services cancelled.
It’s a win win for all.
Finally we need more people to work on finding all this waste.
We propose that government give out a grant to those finding this waste to help fund their work. Grant is possibly not the right word…..perhaps commission (it is earned) is better?. What do you think, since wOOw is you.
Propose that for every €100,000 saved that the government give at least €20,000 to help fund an individual for 12months at this work.
From this example project alone wOOw is looking for €47,968 and will should employ one person allowing for employers prsi . Its author is looking for no persoal reward.
Over the next few weeks some more projects will be highlighted hopefully leading to action being taken and wOOw is confident that some more funds will be generated to help employ more.
The waste above is only the tip of the iceberg.
We need to mine it.
Remember waste can come under many headings including, time, energy, space, food, clothing, talent……
Keep…… Watching over our waste…..

Proposal: In the interest of the environment, fairness, and wasted public money (yours) all posting of election posters as is currently practiced be ceased going forward. Also proposed is a ban on postings on any private locations, for example, billboards and bus stops. Furthermore, the use of printed election leaflets be ceased and all put online. And finally, the sending of the litirum thoghchan in so-called free post be also put online.

Picture from 2020 . There are two more behind the two small Santas. can you guess who? The person already has posters in the picture. note Burke already has three.
wOOw proposes, what is the case in other European countries that each candidate should be allowed to post a small poster on local council-designated boards. This will allow candidates to put a small photo along with a message of what they stand for in a public place. Each candidate will get the same amount of space. A much more democratic and fair process.

Identical Twins? no. also on a public sign….not allowed. and near a very dangerous bend.
Introductiion
Leaving aside the carbon footprint in the production of election posters consider the amount of CO2 emitted by all the crews going around in vans, erecting and taking them down often leaving the ties behind or on the ground…itself a major environmental and hazard issue.
wOOw estimate that tens of thousands of trees are needed to absorb the CO2 released as a result of elections. Many trees were also wastefully used to make leaflets often filled with empty promises.
We are now aware that all the information that candidates wish to put in public can be put online. We are in the 21st century. Are we not? We need to make our public representatives aware.
Further down you will see wOOw solutions for those who cannot access the online literature. In the 2020 general election, an post was paid over €14m for a so-called free election post service …approx. €7 per household. It’s possibly near €10 for this year. That’s the cost to you. Do consider also the environmental cost of all that literature. You will pay when the 8bn/20bn fine comes in (€4444/€8888 per household) …to be paid by increasing your tax bill. Ask yourself what percentage is read. Why so many copies of the same to individual households? No effort is being made to reduce the waste. Must end, now along with all the other waste. End now and we won’t have to pay. The power is in your hands.

picture 2024 , opposite Earl of Desmond hotel, Tralee
12 posters from one candidate, six on either side of a trailer and two on posts beside. The good news is Irelands only “dependent” candidate got all
14 removed 2 days before the election. 

While it must be acknowledged, that Ireland like many European countries runs their elections at a fraction of the cost of countries like the US and Australia we can still improve and show leadership to bigger wasters. Money is just one aspect. In today’s world, we must also consider the environmental impact on us all. On a positive note we must, when we change to being less wasteful advertise our leadership because we also need to get other countries to look, quantify, and stop their wasteful practices which affect the world and we are part of that world. This will encourage others in countries outside our jurisdiction to follow our example.
Elected TDs can claim much of their election expenses. In effect, you help pay for their posters and leaflets. Even say where businesses donate, that money comes out of the customer’s (your) pockets to start. It’s bad enough to have to pay for a reasonable amount of posters but that you have help to pay for the overuse/misuse of posters or unread leaflets is beyond a joke, especially in an era where concerns for the environment and the cost of living are ever-rising.
Even those who choose not to vote often due to protest still end up paying towards elections.
As you are the payee, it’s reasonable to expect that if it’s information you are paying for you need information, not multiple posters within meters of each other, of the same face with no message. You are paying for faces on posters.
Consider as an example if you went into a supermarket to buy one carton of milk and came home with seven empty cartons with the name of the company on the outside of each but no milk. Passing several posters of the same candidate, which you have to contribute to paying for and getting no message is a similar issue as the milk carton you paid for with no milk. It is a sheer waste of your money.
Ironically experts have found that a message is being sent by this practice and it is a message of the power of the individual and the party. Research has also suggested that some people vote for the candidate in response to this message. Parties know this. It leads to competition for who can have the most posters. Even smaller parties take part but in fewer locations due to the cost. If they could get more of your money they too would spend more.
Examples will be put up soon in the gallery.
While with other projects wOOw will be looking for a percentage of the savings should its proposal be implemented, in this case, wOOw will be very happy to see the biggest saving going to you with the waste element of the public expenditure on elections reduced. We will need a department for government waste to look into some of these cuts but wOOw suggest cutting by 20% exchequer payments to parties. wOOw also proposes that the amount that a candidate can claim back be reduced by 30%. It recently went up by 29%.
They claimed it was needed to cover inflation. wOOw proposes that the 30% reduction can easily be met by a reduction in waste.

Will those in our (upside down in mannequins shead) Dail get their head around this proposal.

wOOw is working on a proposal that will be more environmentally and less expensive than the current leaflet-dropping system This will benefit all, both those (candidates) wishing to get their message out there and the public who need to know that message. It will again mean more money for you and/or for more necessary public services. Judging by the number of posters in the 2024 election they proved they can waste even more than in 2020. In effect much of, if not all the 29% increase the government to the reclaimable allowance was used to create more waste.
Briefly for now wOOw proposes that a website run by wOOw employees would be made available as an online platform on which all candidates would have an equal amount of space. As it’s online, this space could be bigger than on any printed leaflet.
On its space on the website, a candidate could put a link to their or a party’s website. The charge for the service will be at a fraction of the cost of the old and antiquated system. People who do not have access to the internet could ask their local TD, friends, neighbours, citizen advice bureaus or perhaps post offices to print some leaflets for them.
The big winners will be the public purse and your environment.
You can but only by demanding less waste. Project by project. It’s a win-win
Getting you to pay the penalty is not on.
We need to mine the waste.
wOOw.
More articles on this project as it develops thanks to you.

Content here …

Scroll to Top